United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. Ciccone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is the trial court’s responsibility under Rule 71.1(h) to screen 3 all evidence and exclude from the factfinder’s consideration evidence which an award of just compensation cannot be based on
• holding that comparable sales may be admitted either as substantive and direct proof of the value of the condemned property or to support the opinion of an expert testifying as to the value of the property taken
• holding that comparable sales may be admitted either as substantive and direct proof of the value of the condemned property or to support the opinion of an expert testifying as to the value of the property taken
• stating that a landowner must show a reasonable probability that a regulatory restriction would be removed to value a property for a use that would otherwise be precluded
• holding that judge must find 18 USCA4 Appeal: 23-2129 Doc: 38 Filed: 01/27/2025 Pg: 19 of 19 We agree that, for a project to be reasonably probable, all necessary conditions to that project must be reasonably probable. Where we part ways with MVP (and the district court
• noting fair market value depends on the potential uses that a hypothetical purchaser will consider when evaluating how much to pay for the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).