United States v. $31,000 in United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s preference to use a wheelchair did not give rise to a tenable claim under the ADA
• Explaining that “the plaintiff’s factual statements will be entertained only to the extent that they are supported by the record[.]”
• Explaining that “the plaintiff’s factual statements will be entertained only to the extent that they are supported by the record[.]”
• \A plaintiff cannot advance new arguments in response to a motion for summary judgment when no such claims were raised prior to summary judgment.\
• layperson may not testify about matters involving medical or other specialized knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).