Skip to main content
· 10/4/1989

United States v. $27,820.00 United States Currency

Citations

  • 722 F. Supp. 226
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11888
  • 1989 WL 119713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although less is required in a disclosure of such witnesses than of those covered by Rule 26(a)(2)(B), . . . a mere list of names, accompanied by three-word descriptions of the subject matter of their testimony, is plainly not enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antwerpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.