Skip to main content
· 4/30/2007

United States v. $252,300.00 in United States Currency

Citations

  • 484 F.3d 1271
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9915
  • 2007 WL 1241654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the currency’s packaging — “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane” — “must be given significant probative value”
  • finding evidence of claimant’s inability to substantiate proof of income “is entitled to considerable weight”
  • stating fact that a large amount of currency “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane. . . must be given significant probative value”
  • stating fact that a large amount of currency “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane. . . must be given significant probative value”
  • “Generalized allegations about ... 'known drug destinations’ and ‘known drug routes' do not provide a nexus to drugs on these facts.”
  • “Generalized allegations about … ‘known drug destinations’ and ‘known drug routes’ do not provide a nexus to drugs on these facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Brorby, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.