· 4/30/2007
United States v. $252,300.00 in United States Currency
Citations
- 484 F.3d 1271
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9915
- 2007 WL 1241654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the currency’s packaging — “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane” — “must be given significant probative value”
- finding evidence of claimant’s inability to substantiate proof of income “is entitled to considerable weight”
- stating fact that a large amount of currency “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane. . . must be given significant probative value”
- stating fact that a large amount of currency “bundled in stacks held by rubber bands and wrapped in cellophane. . . must be given significant probative value”
- “Generalized allegations about ... 'known drug destinations’ and ‘known drug routes' do not provide a nexus to drugs on these facts.”
- “Generalized allegations about … ‘known drug destinations’ and ‘known drug routes’ do not provide a nexus to drugs on these facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Brorby, McConnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.