United States v. 21.54 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Marshall County, State of West Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the general rule is that the extent of the take is a discretionary decision for the condemning authority which may not be modified by the judiciary”
• “[T]he discretionary determination by the condemning authority of the extent of the take is not reviewable by the court.”
• “if, ultimately, it is determined that the government has taken more than it has formally condemned and paid for, the landowner may recover under the Tucker Act for the additional take.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).