United States v. $214,370.09 in U.S. Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This factor directs the court to look at the requests in the aggregate to decide whether they are unduly intrusive or burdensome.”
• “[T]he history of the statute, the case law, and the prudent tendency of American courts to avoid construing foreign law support the plain meaning that ‘for use in’ does not require that the discovery be admissible in the foreign proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).