United States v. $18,312.00 in United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government met its burden under Rule 56 to establish that it owned disputed land because the court had issued a prior ruling holding that defendant’s adverse ownership claim was barred under the QTA’s statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).