United States v. $174,206.00 in U.S. Currency, Thomas Richard, Dacia Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence of legitimate income that is insufficient to explain the large amount of property seized” satisfies the preponderance of the evidence standard
• concluding that the government met its burden under either pre- or post-CAFRA standards
• concluding that the government met its burden under either pre- or post-CAFRA standards
• stating that the plaintiff in a civil forfeiture case must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant property is traceable to illicit drug offenses
• noting that claimants appealed from grant of sum- mary judgment in favor of government
• noting that claimants appealed from grant of summary judgment in favor of government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).