United States v. 158.24 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Bee County, Texas, R. J. Welder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidence of a “market” or “demand” for the landowner’s proposed highest and best use
• affirming exclusion of landowner’s evidence that land could have commanded higher prices if it were subdivided into “small rural tracts held, for example for recreational or residential purposes” where such subdivision was “speculative”
• “A partial taking refers to appropriation in fee of a segment of a larger tract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).