· 4/2/1986
United States v. 1328 North Main Street
Citations
- 634 F. Supp. 1069
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a ruling on the merits of a Rule 41(e) motion seeking suppression as well as return of property must embrace in its analysis the various dimensions of the exclusionary rule”
- “The phrase ‘together with other fruits, instrumentalities, and evidence of viola-tions of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846' does not render the warrant insufficiently particular.... ’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.