Skip to main content
· 4/2/1986

United States v. 1328 North Main Street

Citations

  • 634 F. Supp. 1069
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a ruling on the merits of a Rule 41(e) motion seeking suppression as well as return of property must embrace in its analysis the various dimensions of the exclusionary rule”
  • “The phrase ‘together with other fruits, instrumentalities, and evidence of viola-tions of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846' does not render the warrant insufficiently particular.... ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.