Skip to main content
· 8/28/1945

United States v. 10,620 Square Feet

Citations

  • 62 F. Supp. 115
  • 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Some inventions, however meritorious, do not constitute patentable subject matter, e.g., printed matter.... ” (citation omitted)
  • Nonstatutory claims are “drawn to mathematical problem-solving algorithms or to purely mental steps.”
  • “Some inventions, however meritorious, do not constitute patentable subject matter, e.g., printed mat- ter.”
  • method of reassigning priorities within a computer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.