United States Underwriters Ins. v. Kum Gang Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restaurant’s valet parking service fell within “‘clear and unmistakable’ language of the ‘auto exclusion’ which bars liability when the vehicle is being ‘used’ in an ‘auto business’”
• declining to exercise jurisdiction over indemnification claim where \a determination of the insurers' respective liability exposure\ would be \theoretical\ and \might be made moot by a finding of non-liability in the state court action\
• “Policy exclusions are interpreted in a manner most beneficial to the insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).