United States Trustee v. CF & I Fabricators of Utah, Inc. (In Re CF & I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as “merit-less” the argument that the plan must be amended to allow the UST to enforce the statutory fee obligation
• noting that fees only applied prospectively to disbursements made after the effective date and, thus, were no different from post-confirmation taxes and other expenses which might change over time
• declaring “not retroactive” a statute imposing prospective fees on debtors who had already entered bankruptcy
• construing 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a)(6)(A), the Tenth Circuit held that “Congress intended debtors pay UST fees until a case is converted, dismissed, or closed leaving no open docket in which to assess the fees.”
• “Congress intended debtors pay UST fees until a case is converted, dismissed, or closed leaving no open docket in which to assess the fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).