United States Trust Co. of New York v. Herriott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the judge did not abuse his discretion in ordering the entry of judgment where the counterclaims were factually and legally distinct and where nothing had been presented to demonstrate that the counterclaims had merit
• noting as another important factor whether “the remaining claims and counterclaims were factually and legally distinct from the claim” certified
• describing predicament of defendant who faces parallel criminal and civil proceedings
• denial of continuance in civil case where defendant subject to a simultaneous State grand jury investigation in New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).