United States Steel Mining Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the WCJ’s reliance upon incompetent medical evidence plainly could not be severed from the WCJ’s credibility determination;” accordingly, the WCJ’s reliance upon the incompetent testimony to render a credibility determination was not “harmless error.”
• injuries identified in referee decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).