Skip to main content
· 3/25/1958

United States Steel Corporation v. Walton

Citations

  • 39 Ala. App. 430
  • 104 So. 2d 331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “FDIC has cited no other authority for the concept that a plaintiff suing a defendant against which it has no adverse interest, can nonetheless satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement by asserting it has a dispute with another plaintiff.”
  • “We hold that, because the sum of (i) the FDIC’s claim and (ii) Admiral’s restitution claims that the FDIC asserts it owes is less than the amount the failed thrift owes to the government, the case-or-controversy requirement is not satisfied as to the FDIC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.