United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nutmeg Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 15(a)(3) “does not direct a response to the ‘amendment,’ as it might have, but to the ‘amended pleading’”
• noting that Rule 15(a)(3) “does not direct a response to the ‘amendment,’ as it might have, but to the ‘amended pleading’
• denying a plaintiffs motion to strike in part for the plaintiffs failure to raise any viable prejudice arguments
• “Since the amending pleader chooses to redo his original work, and receives the benefit of this nunc pro tunc treatment, he can hardly be heard to complain that claims filed against him are improper because they should have been asserted in response to his original pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).