United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. H. Thomas Fehn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that without more, sincere 8 assurances of an intent to refrain from aiding and abetting future violations are insufficient 9 to militate against an injunction
• “[Sincere assurances of an intent to refrain from aiding and abetting future violations are insufficient, without more, to militate against an injunction.”
• “[T]he second factor weighs in [defendant’s] favor, since the SEC cites no other securities law violations on [defendant’s] part....”
• lack of remorse may be inferred from a defendant’s 27 continued insistence on validity of his conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).