Skip to main content
· 5/21/1962

United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. United Steelworkers

Citations

  • 181 A.2d 353
  • 37 N.J. 343
  • 1962 N.J. LEXIS 226
  • 50 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “it is elementary in our practice that applications relative to costs and allowance of counsel fees are to be made in the court in which the costs accrued or the services claimed for were rendered”
  • concluding that “it is elementary in our practice that applications relative to costs and allowance of counsel fees are to be made in the court in which the costs accrued or the services claimed for were rendered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.