Skip to main content
· 5/2/2000

United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Elzay Depew,opinion

Citations

  • 210 F.3d 1061
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3408
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4623
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8582
  • 2000 WL 519008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district court had implicitly denied defendant’s discovery motion by entering judgment of conviction without expressly ruling on motion
  • treating a district court’s failure to rule on a motion for employment of an expert witness as an implicit denial
  • indicating that a “fact-intensive inquiry” will generally be reviewed for clear error
  • remanding to the district court for determination of the curtilage issue
  • “We treat the district court’s failure to rule on [the defendant’s] motion as a denial of it.”
  • “We treat the district court’s failure to rule on [the defendant’s] motion as a denial of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Thompson, Kelleher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.