United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Charles Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that unremarkable comings and goings, though possibly consistent with drug activity, could not form any part of the reasonable suspicion analysis
• noting that furtive conduct by people coming to and going from a residence such as driving in “counter-surveillance fashion” and waiting for signals from a lookout can be accepted as indicia of illegal activity
• “Reasonable suspicion must be based on more than an officer’s ‘inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or ‘hunch.’ ”’ (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).