· 3/24/2000
United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Frederick Lamar Hamilton
Citations
- 208 F.3d 1165
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2330
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3154
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4652
- 2000 WL 300824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that due process requires only “reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard”
- excusing a clerical error despite the failure to file a correct amended information
- “As long as the information provides clear notice to a defendant of the prior convictions (and the court gives an opportunity to attack convictions . . .), then the statute has been satisfied.”
- listing an incorrect year of conviction was a clerical error
- noting the service requirements of the statute
- noting the service requirements of the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Tashima, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.