Skip to main content
· 3/24/2000

United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Frederick Lamar Hamilton

Citations

  • 208 F.3d 1165
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2330
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3154
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4652
  • 2000 WL 300824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process requires only “reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard”
  • excusing a clerical error despite the failure to file a correct amended information
  • “As long as the information provides clear notice to a defendant of the prior convictions (and the court gives an opportunity to attack convictions . . .), then the statute has been satisfied.”
  • listing an incorrect year of conviction was a clerical error
  • noting the service requirements of the statute
  • noting the service requirements of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Tashima, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.