Skip to main content
· 5/26/2000

United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Alameda Gateway Ltd.

Citations

  • 213 F.3d 1161
  • 2000 A.M.C. 1807
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 5541
  • 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20651
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4140
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11763
  • 2000 WL 679778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ER 1165-2-131 was a policy statement intended “to guide the practice of district engineers” rather than a substantive rule
  • reaching the same conclusion based on similar “Purpose” text in a different ER

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Brunetti, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.