Skip to main content
· 9/10/2001

United States of America v. Nathan Benedict Dogskin, Jr.

Citations

  • 265 F.3d 682
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19989
  • 2001 WL 1028279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to meet the materiality requirement, evidence must be \more than merely cumulative or impeaching\
  • absent exceptional circumstances, new trial motion based on new evidence may be decided on affidavits without hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Gibson, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.