Skip to main content
· 2/11/2005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. JOSE ANGEL ALMENDARES, —

Citations

  • 397 F.3d 653
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 542
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2210
  • 2005 WL 323693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding to be adequate the trial-time disclosure of evidence that a witness identified an alternate suspect, where defense did not recall witness but cross-examined another witness regarding the identification
  • holding to be adequate the trial-time disclosure of evidence that a witness identified an alternate suspect, where defense did not recall witness but cross-examined another witness regarding the identification
  • considering “the distance between the crimes in space and time” and concluding seven-month gap and fifteen-mile distance supported similarities
  • standard of review; Brady violation not present where “information is furnished before it is too late for the defendant to use it at trial”
  • standard of review; Brady violation not present where “information is furnished before it is too late for the defendant to use it at trial”
  • “Brady does not require pretrial disclosure, and due process is satisfied if the information is furnished before it is too late for the defendant to use it at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Hansen, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.