United States of America v. Edmond Xavier Ramirez, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that § 1B1.3(a)(2)'s \same course of conduct or common scheme or plan\ requirement is relevant when offenses are subject to grouping under § 3D1.2(d)
• recognizing that § 1B1.3(a)(2)'s \same course of conduct or common scheme or plan\ requirement is relevant when offenses are subject to grouping under § 3D1.2(d)
• noting that the indictment defines the scope of the criminal scheme for restitution purposes when a defendant is convicted by a jury
• reversing an order which required restitution related to a scheme broader than that charged in the indictment
• reversing an order which required restitution related to a scheme broader than that charged in the indictment
• “[A]n order to pay restitution beyond that authorized by the statute is a plain error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).