United States of America v. Dico, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CERCLA defendants bear the burden of proving that the government’s requested recovery costs are inconsistent with the NCP
• concluding that “oversight and indirect costs are recoverable in remedial actions under CERCLA”
• finding a “clear statement” in the statutory language authorizing recovery of the government’s remedial action oversight costs
• affirming the striking of defense where plaintiff’s taking was clearly authorized by federal statute
• “Presum- ablyany attorney fees that were not reasonably incurred would be held inconsistent with the NCP (emphasis added
• the district court properly struck a due process affirmative defense on the ground that it was foreclosed by a prior decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).