United States of America v. Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A \B\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the PLRA applies to a post-conviction Rule 41(g) motion converted to a civil action
• stating that \habeas actions are a unique hybrid of civil and criminal\
• noting that \habeas actions are a unique hybrid of civil and criminal\
• “We further order that our ruling shall be applied prospectively only and shall not affect those post-conviction Rule 41(e) appeals in which the appellant has already been granted in forma pauperis status.”
• not- ing that \habeas actions are a unique hybrid of civil and criminal\
• “Although we are aware that Congress primarily targeted prisoner civil rights cases in enacting the filing fee provision of the PLRA, see Smith v. Angelone, 111 F.3d 1126, 1130 (4th Cir.1997), the text of the Act is not limited to such actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).