United States of America, United States of America, State of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Shale Processors, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in cases where a defendant’s conduct was willful, a court was not required to balance the equities
• holding that to constitute affirmative misconduct, “at a minimum the official must intentionally or recklessly mislead the estoppel claimant.”
• recognizing that allowing each state to set air quality standards for local businesses would encourage industries to shift to states with most lenient standards
• noting that applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel against the government can raise a variety of potential separation of powers problems
• explaining that “statutory violations do not, in and of themselves, constitute irreparable harm for purposes of injunctive relief on a preliminary basis”
• explaining that “statutory violations do not, in and of themselves, constitute irreparable harm for purposes of injunctive relief on a preliminary basis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).