· 11/30/2004
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ERIBERTO MELESIO BRIONES, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
Citations
- 390 F.3d 610
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24668
- 2004 WL 2709689
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the ‘first step’ in Justice Kennedy’s ‘narrower test’ is ‘to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy’
- explaining that the `first step' in Justice Kennedy's `narrower test' is `to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy'
- explaining that the “first step” in Justice Kennedy’s “narrower test” is “to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy”
- applying Elstad after determining that law enforcement officers did not use a “deliberate strategy” of two-step interrogation to circumvent Miranda
- examining objective evidence in the record to conclude that interrogators did not use a deliberate strategy of two-step interrogations
- applying Elstad after determining that law enforcement offi- cers did not use a “deliberate strategy” of two-step interroga- tion to circumvent Miranda
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Heaney, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.