Skip to main content
· 11/30/2004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ERIBERTO MELESIO BRIONES, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT

Citations

  • 390 F.3d 610
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24668
  • 2004 WL 2709689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the ‘first step’ in Justice Kennedy’s ‘narrower test’ is ‘to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy’
  • explaining that the `first step' in Justice Kennedy's `narrower test' is `to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy'
  • explaining that the “first step” in Justice Kennedy’s “narrower test” is “to determine whether a [two-step] interrogation process was used as a deliberate strategy”
  • applying Elstad after determining that law enforcement officers did not use a “deliberate strategy” of two-step interrogation to circumvent Miranda
  • examining objective evidence in the record to conclude that interrogators did not use a deliberate strategy of two-step interrogations
  • applying Elstad after determining that law enforcement offi- cers did not use a “deliberate strategy” of two-step interroga- tion to circumvent Miranda

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Heaney, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.