United States of America, Plaintiff/appellant/cross-Appellee v. Robert Nall, Defendant/appellee/ Cross-Appellant, and Robert McIntosh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government improperly charged three structuring violations where defendant made three deposits and “source of each deposit was the same lump sum ..., identical except for the date of the deposit”
• holding that there was only one source for three separate bank deposits where all of the money came from one lump sum payment to the defendant, and that, accordingly, there was only one structuring count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).