United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Anthony Sheppard, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding conviction under constructive possession theory when, among other facts, the defendant “was seen several times at the house in which the drugs were found.”
• affirming defendant’s conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in part because the defendant “was seen several times at the house in which the drugs were found”
• upholding conviction under constructive possession theory when, among other facts, the defendant “was seen several times at the house in which the drugs were found” and “a large number of people were seen coming and going from the house”
• defendant waived suppression argument when he filed motion to suppress evidence but then withdrew the motion
• “Sheppard did not forfeit his suppression argument; he waived the argument by withdrawing his motion to suppress prior to trial. Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to consider the argument.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).