UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. OPLINGER, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s finding that the “evidence shows that [the defendant] did testify as [sic] a material, relevant issue of fact falsely”
• “[W]e respectfully disagree with the First, Seventh and Tenth Circuits, which have all held that pre[]arrest silence comes within the proscription against commenting on a defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).