UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Bruce LUSSIER, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction where defendant inserted explosive powder and fuses into CO2 cartridges because “unrebutted evidence at trial showed that the nature and characteristics of the CO2 devices made them useful solely as weapons”
• “[W]e have consistently held that although either intent or design is required as an element of the crime under subsection (C), a showing of intent is not required under subsection (A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).