Skip to main content
· 11/4/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 1495
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8147
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1146
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28978
  • 1996 WL 648276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government’s error in submitting potentially privileged material with an ex parte application for Zolin crime-fraud determination was harmless because the district judge explicitly disregarded the allegedly privileged materials
  • adding the attorney-client privilege “ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle”
  • finding courts may not consider the potentially 5 privileged documents in deciding whether the threshold inquiry for in camera review has 6 been met
  • analyzing the difference (and overlap) between 17 business and legal advice
  • rebuttable presumption 3 17 || that lawyer is hired to give legal advice
  • rebuttable presumption that lawyer is hired to give legal advice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Kleinfeld, Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.