· 11/4/1996
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Citations
- 99 F.3d 1495
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8147
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1146
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28978
- 1996 WL 648276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the government’s error in submitting potentially privileged material with an ex parte application for Zolin crime-fraud determination was harmless because the district judge explicitly disregarded the allegedly privileged materials
- adding the attorney-client privilege “ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle”
- finding courts may not consider the potentially 5 privileged documents in deciding whether the threshold inquiry for in camera review has 6 been met
- analyzing the difference (and overlap) between 17 business and legal advice
- rebuttable presumption 3 17 || that lawyer is hired to give legal advice
- rebuttable presumption that lawyer is hired to give legal advice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Kleinfeld, Wilken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.