UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SERVICE DELI INC., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a set of handwritten notes taken by a government attorney during an interview with the govern- ment’s key witness was material “most significantly” because the notes included a statement by the witness that he had sus- tained a stroke that affected his memory
• “[T]he materiality requirement of a § 1001 violation is satisfied if the statement is capable of influencing or affecting a federal agency.”
• “[T]he test is the intrinsic capabilities of the false statement itself, rather than the possibility of the actual attainment of its end as measured by collateral circumstances.”
• “The false statement need not have actually influenced the agency . . . and the agency need not rely on the information in fact for it to be material.”
• \[The] test for materiality is the intrinsic capabilities of the statement itself ....\
• false statements or use of false documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).