Skip to main content
· 6/17/1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger NYEMASTER, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 116 F.3d 827
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4554
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 7565
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14971
  • 1997 WL 327488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that upon review of a judgment of acquittal we will “affirm if any rational factfinder could find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”
  • “A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is reviewed under a highly deferential standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Ferguson, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.