Skip to main content
· 5/21/1999

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney HEDGES, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 175 F.3d 1312
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9773
  • 1999 WL 320800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not err in relying on statements in presentence investigative report where the statements were undisputed by the defendant
  • permitting a district court to rely on statements from the PSI that are “undisputed”
  • re- viewing an issue not preserved in a criminal case for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Dubina, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.