Skip to main content
· 5/2/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. SILVER, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 289
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3057
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 5103
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10037
  • 1996 WL 219112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arising from a crime committed prior to the effective date of the 1984 sentencing act
  • noting also that the judge in an extension proceeding need not make a detailed factual inquiry into whether the probationer committed a violation, but only must determine what is in the best interest of society
  • The federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 requires hearings before probation extensions, but due process does not require a hearing for a probation extension.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Trott, Van Sickle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.