· 5/2/1996
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. SILVER, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 83 F.3d 289
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3057
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 5103
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10037
- 1996 WL 219112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- arising from a crime committed prior to the effective date of the 1984 sentencing act
- noting also that the judge in an extension proceeding need not make a detailed factual inquiry into whether the probationer committed a violation, but only must determine what is in the best interest of society
- The federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 requires hearings before probation extensions, but due process does not require a hearing for a probation extension.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Trott, Van Sickle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.