Skip to main content
· 4/10/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. PETTY, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 80 F.3d 1384
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2454
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 4126
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6983
  • 1996 WL 165012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We review de novo the issue [of] whether [defendant] has waived his right to appeal.\ (citing United States v. Catherine, 55 F.3d 1462, 1464(9th Cir. 1995))
  • “Like any other contract, we must interpret [a plea agreement] so as to carry out the intention of the parties. . . .”
  • \We review de novo the issue [of] whether [defendant] has waived his right to appeal.\ (citing United States v. Catherine, 55 F.3d 1462 , 1464 (9th Cir. 1995) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Trott, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.