Skip to main content
· 10/12/1995

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Edward STEARNS, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 328
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8030
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 13782
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28210
  • 1995 WL 608543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel is ineffective for failing to file an appeal if the defendant did not consent to the failure to file the appeal
  • holding that a defendant need only show that he did not consent to his counsel's failure to file an appeal for it to be ineffective assistance of counsel
  • holding that a defen- dant need only show that he did not consent to his counsel’s failure to file an appeal for it to be ineffective assistance of counsel
  • holding that test for ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to file a desired direct appeal, even in a plea case, was not whether an appeal was requested, but whether the decision not to file an appeal was consented to by the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Reinhardt, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.