· 8/1/1996
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melbourne SHAW, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 91 F.3d 86
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 9320
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5681
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18876
- 1996 WL 428508
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming application of the two-point carjacking enhancement to Hobbs Act robbery when robbers committed a carjacking while escaping from an armed robbery
- physical restraint of bank robbery victims reasonably foreseeable because defendant under orders to make sure nobody entered or left bank during robbery and to \pull in\ anybody from parking lot
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brunetti, Rymer, Tanner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.