Skip to main content
· 8/1/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melbourne SHAW, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 91 F.3d 86
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 9320
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5681
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18876
  • 1996 WL 428508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming application of the two-point carjacking enhancement to Hobbs Act robbery when robbers committed a carjacking while escaping from an armed robbery
  • physical restraint of bank robbery victims reasonably foreseeable because defendant under orders to make sure nobody entered or left bank during robbery and to \pull in\ anybody from parking lot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brunetti, Rymer, Tanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.