UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that without more, allegations that additional \charges were filed because the defendants had moved to suppress evidence [are] . . . insufficient to create a presumption of vindictiveness\
• playing the tapes in the jury room was “akin to allowing a new witness to testify privately, without cross-examination”
• stating \[a] protective sweep may last 'no longer than it takes to complete the arrest and depart the premises' \ (quoting Buie, 494 U.S. at 335-36 , 110 S.Ct. 1093 )
• similarly explaining that Kow invalidated a warrant on overbreadth grounds because the warrant “set no time limits and allowed seizure of essentially all the business’s records, computer hardware and software, files, ledgers, and invoices”
• stmctural error for the jury to consider unadmitted evidence because it \undermines one of the most fundamental tenets of our justice system: that a defendant's conviction may be based only on the evidence presented during the trial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).