· 3/19/1998
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Masala Majid JAMES, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 139 F.3d 709
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 2739
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1951
- 48 Fed. R. Serv. 1448
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5098
- 1998 WL 120263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a vulnerable victim adjustment where the victim’s pregnancy “created a potential vulnerabil- ity which [the defendant] acknowledged and exploited”
- “The district court may impose reasonable limits on cross-examination, which we will review for an abuse of dis- cretion. Whether limitations on cross-examination are so severe as to amount to a violation of the confrontation clause is a question of law we review de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Tashima, Sedwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.