Skip to main content
· 6/23/1998

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcos CRUZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 147 F.3d 1069
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4841
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 6830
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13237
  • 1998 WL 328082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even assuming unreasonable performance by counsel, petitioner not entitled to relief where prejudice cannot be shown by counsel’s errors
  • “We now hold that, in the interest of efficiency, where a district judge has issued a COA on some but not all of the issues, we will treat the briefing of an uncertified issue as a request for a COA and first decide whether one should issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Farris, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.