Skip to main content
· 1/10/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lomondo Mark SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 175
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 366
  • 43 Fed. R. Serv. 741
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 247
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 298
  • 1996 WL 6970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, we review a motion to suppress de novo and the trial court’s factual findings for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hawkins, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.