Skip to main content
· 9/4/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Tamayo BARON, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 94 F.3d 1312
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6616
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 10815
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23269
  • 1996 WL 496985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no evidence that accused, rather than a reasonable person, had his suspicion aroused concerning drug trafficking
  • “In this case, Baron argues that the government presented insuffi- cient evidence establishing that he (1) suspected that the car contained drugs, (2) deliberately avoided taking steps to confirm or deny those suspi- cions, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Leavy, Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.