UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Rosario GARIBAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a suspect with an IQ score that placed him in the borderline range of intellectual functioning did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights
• holding that defendant could not have knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights because his “IQ is borderline retarded” and he was unable “to understand oral instructions”
• concluding that a suspect with an IQ score that placed him in the borderline range of intellectual functioning did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights
• holding admission not harmless where defendant’s statements “were the thrust of the prosecution’s case”
• finding that statement was not knowingly and intelligently made where the suspect “did not appear to understand” the questions
• stating that the factors listed were \considerations [to] guide our COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 10 (0) 194713 inquiry\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).