Skip to main content
· 3/25/1999

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 170 F.3d 1241
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2159
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 2815
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5053
  • 1999 WL 160848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant in a proceeding has the initial burden of producing evidence showing prejudice from the violation of the Convention
  • noting that “[b]y raising his claim in a pretrial suppression motion, the appellant exercised his rights under the Convention in conformity with our laws”
  • holding that Article 36(1)(b) establishes an individual right
  • reversing trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence based on a violation of his rights under the Convention
  • \[T]he defendant in a criminal proceeding has the initial burden of producing evidence showing prejudice from the violation of the Convention.\
  • \[T]he defendant in a criminal proceeding has the initial burden of producing evidence showing prejudice from the violation of the Convention.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Boochever, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.