UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that intended or attempted loss would be included in sentencing determination where, but for the interception of wrongdoing by an auditor, the defendant would have caused a determinate amount of losses
• finding that intended or attempted loss would be included in sentencing determination where, but for the interception of wrongdoing by an auditor, the defendant would have caused a determinate amount of losses
• finding that intended or attempted loss would be included in sentencing determination where, but for the interception of wrongdoing by an auditor, the defendant would have caused a determinate amount of losses
• explaining that the defendant’s own testimony can be used to establish deliberate ignorance
• applying United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 522-23, 115 S. Ct. 2310, 2320, 132 L. Ed. 2d 444 (1995) (holding that materiality is a jury question
• stating evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if a reasonable jury could find the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).